



Master Ultra Thin Small Second Pink Gold Diamond 40
REF. 1272510
5/10
ScarceCase
Dial
In Context
At 40 mm it is sized to the current mainstream: 40 mm is the median across every watch measured in this catalogue. At 8.6 mm thick it is about average for a modern wristwatch. The case back is open, so the movement is visible without taking the watch apart, and the sapphire crystal will resist everything short of deliberate abuse. 50 m covers rain and hand-washing comfortably; it is not a watch to swim in.
The movement winds itself from the motion of your wrist. 43 hours of reserve carries it overnight, but not through a weekend in a drawer. At 28,800 vph the seconds hand advances 8 times a second.
1272510 is one of 2 executions of the 1272510 base reference. Underneath they are the same watch; what separates this one is a beige dial and a pink gold case. Introduced in 2014.
The 1272510 family
1272510 is one of 2 variants sharing the 1272510 base reference — same watch underneath, different dial, bezel, or bracelet execution. Browse the others:
Inside: Caliber 896
Explore this caliber →Automatic movement with hours, minutes and seconds. 223 components; height 3.98mm.
5 other watches in the library run the Jaeger-LeCoultre 896.

Jaeger-LeCoultre
Master Ultra Thin Small Second
1278420 · 38.5 mm

Jaeger-LeCoultre
Master Ultra Thin Small Second Pink Gold
1272510 was introduced at SIHH 2014. It features a pink gold case and an eggshell beige dial. · 38.5 mm

Jaeger-LeCoultre
Master Ultra Thin Small Second 40 Bracelet
1358120 · 40 mm

Jaeger-LeCoultre
Master Ultra Thin Small Second Pink Gold 40
1352520 · 40 mm
Similar Watches

Jaeger-LeCoultre - 1278420 Master Ultra Thin Small Second
Jaeger-LeCoultre

Jaeger-LeCoultre - 1358120 Master Ultra Thin Small Second 40 Bracelet
Jaeger-LeCoultre

Jaeger-LeCoultre - 1352520 Master Ultra Thin Small Second Pink Gold 40
Jaeger-LeCoultre

Jaeger-LeCoultre - 1358420 Master Ultra Thin Small Second 40
Jaeger-LeCoultre

Jaeger-LeCoultre - 800652J Geophysic 1958 Platinum
Jaeger-LeCoultre
Discussion
0 commentsLoading…